Home
/
Blog
/
Checkbox TPRM is Dead. Start Engineering Risk

Checkbox TPRM is Dead. Start Engineering Risk

By
Eddie
|
February 7, 2026
|
3 minutes
Table of Contents

Let’s say the quiet part out loud: Checkbox TPRM is a waste of time.

Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) used to be manageable. You had 20 critical vendors. You sent 20 spreadsheets. You received 20 PDFs. You looked at some fake security scores. You got the regulators off your back, and you moved on.

Not anymore. We’ve lost control over Third-Party Sprawl – there are more third parties than ever before, and every AI tool, SaaS app, and strategic partner is wired straight into the heart of your business. When they break, you break - their failure quickly becomes your failure.

We’ve seen the consequences. One vendor fails, and the global economy halts.

There is only one conclusion: the compliance theater MUST STOP. We need to start engineering risk.

The Pivot: From Box Checker to Risk Engineer

We founded Lema because the truth is unavoidable: TPRM analysts are being set up to fail.

They shouldn't just be checking compliance. They need to detect the risks that genuinely threaten the business and deliver the exact steps to shut them down.

In short, they need to turn into Risk Engineers.

This is not a title change. It is a fundamental shift in philosophy.

  • Box Checkers ask the business if the vendor is critical. Risk Engineers deduce criticality by seeing exactly how the vendor connects to critical infrastructure.
  • Box Checkers send 500 questions to each supplier. Risk Engineers know the 5 tests that need to happen to understand if this supplier is going to break the business.
  • Box Checkers create reports. Risk Engineers create action - whether it’s revoking permissions, adding contractual clauses, or switching vendors.

To make this shift, we didn't need another tool to help us manage checklists faster (through AI, of course. Must have AI!). We needed a platform that thinks like a hacker.

And this is why we’ve built Lema

Backed by Team8, F2, and Salesforce Ventures, we built Lema with a specific DNA: Analyze and monitor third-party risk with the mindset of an elite vulnerability researcher.

We use Agentic AI not to summarize text, but to reveal the risks that genuinely threaten your business – and deliver the exact steps to shut them down.

The old world was about covering your liability. The new world is about controlling your reality.

Start Engineering Risk.

Key Takeaways

Checkbox TPRM can't handle third-party sprawl: When integrated vendors fail, your business fails—questionnaires and reports won't prevent that.
Shift from Box Checker to Risk Engineer: Analyze actual vendor connections, run targeted tests, and take action to stop threats.
Control reality, not liability: Lema's Agentic AI thinks like a hacker to uncover real risks and deliver specific fixes.

FAQs

Why can't traditional TPRM handle third-party sprawl?

Traditional TPRM relies on questionnaires and compliance documents designed for managing a handful of vendors. With third-party sprawl, organizations now have hundreds of vendors deeply integrated into critical systems, every AI tool, SaaS app, and partner has direct access to your infrastructure. When these deeply connected vendors break, checkbox assessments can't detect the genuine risks that cause immediate business failures.

What does it mean to shift from Box Checker to Risk Engineer in TPRM?

Box Checkers send questionnaires, ask if vendors are critical, and generate compliance reports. Risk Engineers analyze how vendors actually connect to critical infrastructure, conduct targeted vulnerability tests, and take concrete actions like revoking permissions or switching vendors. It's the difference between documenting risk for regulators and actively controlling it to protect your business.

How does Lema's Agentic AI think like a hacker to manage third-party risk?

Lema's Agentic AI applies a vulnerability researcher's mindset—analyzing how third parties connect to critical systems, identifying exploitable weaknesses the way an attacker would, and delivering specific remediation steps. Instead of summarizing compliance documents, it uncovers genuine threats that traditional assessments miss and tells you exactly how to shut them down.

What is third-party sprawl and why is it dangerous?

Third-party sprawl is the uncontrolled proliferation of external vendors with access to your systems and data—every AI tool, SaaS app, and integration adds to it. It's dangerous because traditional TPRM can't scale to assess hundreds of vendors effectively, and when any deeply integrated vendor fails due to breaches or outages, that failure cascades directly into your business operations.

What makes Risk Engineering different from traditional TPRM compliance?

Traditional TPRM compliance focuses on satisfying regulatory requirements through documentation and standardized processes—checkbox exercises that create false security. Risk Engineering focuses on identifying actual threats through technical analysis of vendor connections, targeted vulnerability testing, and actionable remediation that actively reduces exposure rather than just documenting it.

How does Lema deliver actionable fixes for third-party risks?

Lema provides specific remediation steps for each risk—revoking vendor permissions, adding contractual clauses, implementing technical controls, or recommending vendor alternatives. By thinking like a hacker, Lema identifies exact weaknesses in your third-party ecosystem and tells you precisely how to close them, turning risk insights into immediate action.

About the Author
Eddie
CEO & Co-Founder, Lema.ai
Eddie Dovzhik is the Co-Founder and CEO of Lema.ai. An experienced Cyber R&D Group Leader with a background in elite intelligence units, Eddie specializes in managing complex product life cycles and large-scale technical projects. At Lema, he is dedicated to transforming Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) by using AI to provide real-time, proactive risk mitigation for global organizations.
OUR RESOURCES

Level up with Lema